On March 7th 200 business leaders joined over 2 million people to tell President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry to reject the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. Exactly one month later (April 7th) more than 100 scientists and economists sent a letter saying that the Keystone is not in the national interest and they further demanded that it must be stopped.
Not only will rejecting the pipeline send a powerful symbolic message, but it will also achieve the all-important objective of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. If it is allowed to go through, the keystone would ship 830,000 barrels per day of carbon-intensive tar sands from Alberta to refineries on the US Gulf Coast. According to some scientific assessments if the tar sands are exploited to their full capacity this will mean “game over” for efforts to address climate change.
As of the end of the 30 day comment period on March 7th, the State Department had received more than 2 million comments from Americans and people all over the world calling for the rejection of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. The Keystone XL would lead to an expansion of tar sands production, and this would significantly increase GHGs. It, therefore, fails the climate test that President Obama set for the pipeline.
The public has repeatedly protested against the pipelines, in total there have been more than 280 vigils organized in almost all 50 states.
On March 7 more than 200 business owners and venture capitalists sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry stating that the proposed Keystone XL pipeline is not in US economic interests. The letter states that the costs of the pipeline far outweigh the benefits. They further state that the low cost of ferrying the tar sand will increase the exploitation of this dirty source of fossil fuels. A point that squarely refutes the State Department’s contention that the oil sands will be exploited with or without the pipeline.
As explained in the letter, “Markets rely on both price and policy signals when making investment decisions…While increasing prices for crude oil have
driven interest in further development of tar sands, this development is not inevitable without continued high prices and policy support.”
The letter was sent out by NRDC affiliate E2, a non-profit, non-partisan group of business leaders and others who promote sound environmental policies that drive economic growth. They claim that their members have collectively created more than 570,000 jobs while managing more than $175 billion in venture and private-equity capital.
The letter is signed by prominent members of Silicon Valley including those involved with cleantech as well as executives at Apple, Oracle, Facebook and Google. Other notable signatories include Bob Fisher, the chairman of GAP, and Tedd Saunders, the operator of East Coast hotels.
The most startling claim in the letter is the suggestion that the Keystone XL will cost the American people $100 billion over its lifetime.
As pointed out in the most recent AR5 report, climate change is already costing the world’s economies billions of dollars and leading to resource shortages and other disruptions including those attributable to extreme weather events.
The April 7th letter from leaders in science and economics tells the Obama administration that we must tackle climate change and the first step is to stop using “disproportionately carbon-intensive energy sources like tar sands bitumen” which is 17% more greenhouse gas emissions than conventionally produced fuels over their full lifecycle.
The letter points to significant air and water pollution, health risks as well as dangers associated with transporting oil by pipe. It goes on to say that “over the 50-year expected lifespan of the pipeline, the total emissions from Keystone XL could amount to as much as 8.4 billion metric tons CO2e. These are emissions that can and should be avoided with a transition to clean energy.”
Some of the signatories include
- Dr. Philip W. Anderson, who won the 1977 Nobel Prize in Physics
- Dr. Kenneth J. Arrow, who won 1972 Nobel Prize in Economics
- Dr. James McCarthy, Dr. Richard Norgaard, and Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, Fellows of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
- Dr. Mark Jaccard, Dr. Lawrence Dill, and Dr. Mark Winston, Fellows of the Royal Society of Canada (FRSC)
- Dr. Gretchen Daily, Drs. Paul and Anne Ehrlich, Dr. George Woodwell, Dr. James Hansen, and Dr. Michael Oppenheimer. Winners of Heinz Awards in the Environment
- Dr. Paul Ehrlich, Dr. George Woodwell, Gretchen Daily, winners of the Volvo Environment Prize
- Dr. David Suzuki, a renowned geneticist and science broadcaster.
- Dr. Mark Jaccard, who has contributed a large body of research regarding the design and application of energy-economy models that assess the effectiveness of sustainable energy and climate policies, including serving as a convening lead author for the Global Energy Assessment
- Dr. David Keith, 2006 winner of Canadian Geographic’s “Environmentalist of the Year” – who is both a Harvard Professor and President of a Calgary, Alberta company that works on ways to capture carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere.
Business leaders, scientists, economists, and average people from around the world are speaking with a shared voice that urges the Obama administration to reject the Keystone XL. The President is expected to make a decision on the pipeline in the coming months.
The Fate of the Keystone XL: The Ball is in Your Court Mr President
Refuting the Rationale for Approving the Keystone XL
Video – Two Million Comments Rejecting the Keystone XL Pipeline
Video – Obama’s Top Aids and Democratic Donors Oppose the Keystone XL
Keystone XL will Fly or Fail Depending on Who you Talk to
The Keystone XL Pipeline: Debunking Four Cardinal Lies
Ten Reasons Why Nurses Oppose the Keystone XL
Comparison of the Keystone XL and Renewable Energy
Video – Farcical Comedy on Keystone XL Jobs
How Come the Keystone XL is so Hard to Kill
Oil Spills Add to Concerns about the Keystone XL Pipeline
Video – Van Jones Attacks the Keystone XL Pipeline
Protests Greet the Keystone XL South as it Makes its First Deliveries of Oil
Video – This is What a Corroded Underwater Tar Sands Pipeline Looks Like
Taxpayers Money to Promote Fossil Fuel Pipeline Brought to you by Canada’s Ruling Federal Conservatives
Keystone XL on the Ropes: Conflict of Interest Revealed in the State’s EIS
Obama Says the Number of Keystone XL Jobs are “Negligible
Obama Rebuffs the Keystone XL’s Economic and Jobs Benefits
New Tar Sands Pipeline Goes East to Follow the Path of Least Resistance
The Fate of the Keystone XL Pipeline in the Wake of President Obama’s Georgetown University Speech
Unions Oppose the Keystone XL in the Jobs vs. Environment Debate
EPA Slams State Department on the Keystone XL
Cornell University Questions the Economic Benefits of the Keystone XL Pipeline
American Employment: Keystone XL vs Green Jobs
A New State Department Environmental Impact Assessment Clears the Keystone XL Pipeline
The DoD’s Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap (CCAR) Excludes Keystone XL
Obama to Expedite the Keystone XL Pipeline
Bill McKibben on Obama’s Keystone XL Reversal
Republicans Vow to Continue Push for Keystone
The Center for Biological Diversity CREDO and Friends of the Earth Slam Keystone Reversal
Indigenous People and Students Protest Obama’s Reversal on Keystone XL
GOP’s Keystone XL Proposal Fails in Senate
Anti-Keystone XL Ad Campaign
The Keystone XL and Rising Fuel Prices
Video: Keystone XL will Raise Gas Prices
Republicans Refuse to Let the Keystone XL Die
Keystone XL Protest Message Campaign a Success
Resistance to Republican Efforts to Resurrect the Keystone XL Pipeline
Obama Cancels the Keystone XL Pipeline Project
President Obama Stops Keystone XL Pipeline
Republicans Use Blackmail to Gain Support for the Keystone XL Pipeline
Tar Sands Day of Action in Washington
President Obama and the Fate of the Keystone XL Pipeline
NRDC November 6 Protest Against the Keystone XL in Washington DC
Nebraska’s Special Session to Stop the Keystone XL Pipeline
South Dakota Wants Additional Protections Against Spills from the Keystone XL Pipeline
Safety Measures for the Keystone XL Rejected by Environmentalists in Nebraska
State Department Hearings for the Keystone XL Pipeline
Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline Protest
Keystone XL Protest Ends in Washington
Nobel Prize Laureates Oppose Keystone XL Pipeline
Religious Leaders Join the Protest Against Keystone XL Pipeline
US Protests Against the Tar Sands Oil
Canada on Track to be a Dirty Energy Superpower
Bill McKibben and other Protestors Jailed for their Opposition to the Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline
Video: NASA’s Leading Climatologist Addresses Crowd Before he was Arrested at the Keystone XL Tar Sands Protest in Washington