Thursday, August 18, 2022
The Green Market Oracle
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Wildfires
    • Extreme Weather
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Social Change
    • Activism
    • Disinformation
    • Education
    • Psychology
    • Gender Equality
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Decarbonization
    • Economics
    • Supply Chains
    • Investing
  • Technology
    • Carbon Removal
    • Carbon Capture
    • Transportation
    • Buildings
    • Food
No Result
View All Result
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Wildfires
    • Extreme Weather
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Social Change
    • Activism
    • Disinformation
    • Education
    • Psychology
    • Gender Equality
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Decarbonization
    • Economics
    • Supply Chains
    • Investing
  • Technology
    • Carbon Removal
    • Carbon Capture
    • Transportation
    • Buildings
    • Food
No Result
View All Result
The Green Market Oracle
No Result
View All Result
Home Other

Planned Tar Sands Expansion Negates Global Carbon Reduction Efforts

by Richard Matthews
April 11, 2015
in Other
0

There are plans underway to dramatically increase the amount of tar sands oil being shipped to international markets. If these plans proceed they would undermine efforts to substantially reduce global greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change.

Tar sands oil is some of the most carbon intensive oil on earth. The extraction process of the tar sands alone is three times as carbon intensive as the extraction of conventional oil.

Expanding the tar sands is antithetical to the global climate agreement that is being sought at COP 21 in Paris later this year.  As former NASA scientist James Hansen has said, radical increases in the amount of tar sands oil that goes to market would mean “game over” for efforts to combat climate change.


Oil extraction and transportation not only wreaks havoc on our climate it endangers the lives of millions of people. Oil wells rupture, oil pipelines leak, oil trains explode and oil tankers spill. Whether by pipeline, tanker, train or truck, transporting fossil fuels is dangerous.

There are five proposed pipelines that would ferry up to 6 million barrels of tar sands crude each day. The five pipelines all originate in Alberta’s tar sands. This carbon monstrosity would extend its tentacles in all four directions. Going south to the gulf of Mexico there is the well known Keystone XL and the South Stream, to the West there is the Northern Gateway, going East to the St. Lawrence river there is the Energy East and to the North there is the Arctic Gateway.

Even though oil prices are low and many tar sands development projects have been put on hold as a result Canada’s ruling conservatives and the oil industry are working together to bring a devastating quantity of tar sands oil to market.

The Keystone XL is only one of four proposed pipelines that would ferry up to 5 million barrels of tar sands crude to markets all around the world. This is a carbon bomb game changer that would utterly undermine the world’s carbon reduction efforts.

The US Senate tried to to force the Obama administration to approve the Keystone XL. The President Obama then vetoed this move. The EPA subsequently released its assessment of the project saying that the expansion of the tar sands represents, “a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions.”

We know that fossil fuels are the primary cause of climate change and we also know that the tar sands are some of the dirtiest oil on earth. We simply cannot have a sustainable climate and allow the tar sands to expand. It is time for a science based energy policy. If we want to combat climate change we must keep most of the known fossil fuel reserves in the ground and this is especially true of tar sands.

The NRDC video below reviews the plan and the consequences of tar sands expansion.

ShareTweetShare
Previous Post

Green Electricity in Eastern Canada: A Letter to the Premiers of Quebec and Ontario

Next Post

Harvard Heat Week: Background and Rationale

Related Posts

Seasons Greetings from the Green Market Oracle

by Richard Matthews
December 24, 2021
0

American Courts are Defending Democracy and the Environment

by Richard Matthews
December 14, 2020
0

Despite unprecedented challenges, America's legal system has held. In recent weeks the courts have repeatedly defended democracy and in the last four years they have overturned a wide range of environmental...

Environmental Plebiscites: Municipal Referendums and State Ballot Initiatives

by Richard Matthews
November 12, 2020
0

The November 3rd election not only elected an environmentally responsible president it also gave Americans a chance to vote on environmental issues in five state ballots and two city referendums. Americans ...

Next Post

Harvard Heat Week: Background and Rationale

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • SoundCloud

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

time is running out and climate change is driving extreme global heat waves
Climate Change

How Many Heat Waves Will it Take for us to Act on Climate Change?

by Richard Matthews
August 8, 2022
0

Despite steady increases in global temperatures and years of ever more deadly heat waves, we are not doing anywhere near...

Read more

Nuclear Power Versus Renewable Energy

July 20, 2022

Nuclear Energy Versus Fossil Fuels

July 5, 2022
different types of economic systems assessed by sustainable development goals

Types of Economies and their Implications for Sustainability

June 28, 2022
The facts about Nuclear Energy reveal that it is safe and clean but it is not renewable

Fact Check Reveals Nuclear Energy is Safe and Clean but not Renewable

June 13, 2022
  • About
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Business and Economics
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Social Change
  • Events
  • Other

© 2021 Copyright The Green Market Oracle.

No Result
View All Result
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Supply Chains
  • Economics
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Extreme Weather
    • Wildfires
  • Investing
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Technology
    • Buildings
    • Carbon Capture
    • Food
    • Transportation
  • Social Change
    • Education
    • Activism
    • Psychology

© 2021 Copyright The Green Market Oracle.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In